Impacts of Labor’s proposed negative gearing and CGT changes

Home buying & selling
commentNo Comments

Sydney and Melbourne’s house prices could slide by up to 9 per cent if  Labor gets into power and introduces its planned property tax changes.

At our annual Wealth Retreat Conference over the weekend one of our guest speakers Doron Peleg, CEO of RiskWise Property Research and a regular author here at Property Update discussed a report he co-authored with Pete Wargent assessing the impacts of the proposed reforms.

The ALP has previously proposed to limit negative gearing to new rental dwellings and to halve the CGT tax discount from the current 50 per cent to 25 per cent.

When they initially announced these proposals, the stated intention was to level the playing field for first homebuyers competing with investors, improve housing affordability and strengthen the Commonwealth Budget position through limiting these subsidies.

Peleg said with the next federal election coming up in less than a year, government policies and their implications were being thoroughly assessed by policymakers, lenders, fund managers and property developers.

But things are different now

However, the landscape in the Australian property market has changed and this needs to be taken into consideration.

negative gearingThe authors of the report explain that from the second half of 2017, the risks associated with the residential property market increased significantly, and the proposed reforms need to be assessed thoroughly across all geographical areas to ensure they do not unduly impact the weaker and fragile housing markets.

Credit restrictions and tighter lending standards have had a direct impact on investors in the Australian housing market.

As a result, dwelling prices in Sydney and Melbourne showed a decelerating growth rate, followed by price reductions in Sydney and, to a lesser extent, Melbourne.

However, earlier this year the shadow treasurer Chris Bowen shrugged off suggestions the proposed tax amendments should now be scrapped because falling house prices are now making homes more affordable.
Bowen said that the negative gearing and CGT changes are about making long-term structural adjustments rather than addressing the short-term property cycle.

Property Landscape

However, the two-speed economy driven by the resources construction boom has reversed, and those once-prosperous economies are now lagging.

Peleg says that this necessitates thorough modelling and impact analysis of the proposed tax reform package according to Peleg.

One of the key findings of his analysis is that a blanket introduction of the reforms across the country would have unintended consequences, and some local government areas, especially those with weak or fragile property markets, would be adversely impacted more than others.

The report identifies the Top 10 Local Government areas that would be most impacted if the changes went ahead as currently proposed.

These include Darwin, Mackay, inner-city Perth and Townsville.
Property Landscape 2
Like a 1.5% interest rate rise.

According to the report another unintended consequence would occur in the Sydney unit market where the proposed changes would be the equivalent to a sudden1-1.5 % increase in interest rates.

Projected Price Reductions

Declining dwelling prices, or price deceleration in some regions, would lead to a reduction in dwelling commencements and deteriorating rental affordability in some locations.

Negative Gearing

The analysis also demonstrates that there would be some distortions in the investor market,with the creation of primary and secondary markets for investor stock if subsidies were limited to new housing prospectively, the thinner market on resale potentially increasing the risk of investing in new dwellings.

Report co-author Pete Wargent explained to our attendees at Wealth Retreat that for years property commentators had been talking about a two-speed economy driven by the resources construction boom, but this dynamic had reversed, and those once prosperous areas were now struggling.

“The last thing they need is a further dampening of demand. An introduction of Labor’s proposed changes to negative gearing needs a more nuanced response with some mitigating processes and policies that could be implemented so there is no unintended consequences.”


Mr Peleg said the risks associated with the residential property market had increased significantly since the second half of 2017, and the proposed changes needed to be assessed thoroughly across all local government areas to ensure they did not unduly impact weaker housing markets.

“Credit restrictions have had a direct impact on investors in the Australian housing market. As a result, dwelling prices in Sydney and Melbourne showed a decelerating growth rate, followed by price reductions in Sydney and, to a lesser extent Melbourne” he said.

“In a relatively short period of time, the landscape for residential property in Australia has changed significantly and this necessitates thorough modelling and impact analysis of Labor’s proposed tax reform package.”

The bottom line:

The report was not meant as political commentary – just an independent assessment which explained that the proposed ALP tax reforms will achieve some of their stated objectives, including tackling the fiscal challenge and Budget repair, but not the others.

Tax PropertyIn my mind if property values drop significantly in some locations as suggested, and I have no doubt they will there would be a significant economic flow on effect due to falling consumer confidence as they see property values plummeting.

Another issue is that investors will be driven to buy new properties, both apartments (which will generally be in the CBD and houses (which are likely to be in the outer suburbs.)

Both these types of property make poor investments because of their locations and will make even worse investments as, once purchased, will be established properties.

Now we know around 50% of investors sell up in the first 5 years, so if these investor plan to sell their properties, the value will fall significantly, as their properties won’t attract the tax benefits of a new property any more.

So these poor investors who chase tax benefits will lose out in 2 ways – poorly located properties and ones that won’t appreciate in value.

Michael Yardney

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.